One of the biggest issues that I see happening at Corona del Sol is the fact that teachers cannot choose their own textbooks. The reason for this problem is the lack of money that prevents a teacher from choosing from what book they will teach because students do not purchase their own books. The result, however, causes teachers to deal with material they do not fully understand themselves (thus making teaching quite difficult), or information they feel is irrelevant or unnecessary for a high school education comes to the forefront of the curriculum. How can this issue be reconciled?
When it comes to budgeting, there is a certain amount of money allotted for the purchase of textbooks. Textbooks cannot be purchased every year because the cost exceeds what is available. Therefore, when textbooks are purchased new, who is deciding which books will be purchased?
I propose that teachers be required to examine a collection of textbooks by various publishers on their own. Once a teacher has decided which textbook best suits their classroom environment, he or she prepares a defense for that textbook, to be debated at a meeting in which all teacher who instruct the same class and level will collectively decide which textbook is ideal. This way EACH teacher INDIVIDUALLY researches textbooks to discover which is best for them, and then the group COLLECTIVELY decides upon which book to purchase. By doing this, many teachers who have taught the same class (and thus understand where the curricular priority lies) can restructure their class according to their own values, then discuss with the group the best means (the best textbook) by which to accomplish this. Therefore, the collection of teachers who instruct on the same curriculum periodically re-evaluate their course as a group and decide which direction they need to take in order to give the students the fullest and most practical education possible. Don’t let the district decide, let the teachers choose what they teach.
Granted, some of the textbooks that are used are ideal for the classroom in which they are taught. However, without consistent evaluation of the source of knowledge utilized by the teachers, progress is difficult. The archaic texts must be done away with, and the more modern approaches to the same material should be embraced. The most important part is leaving these decisions in the hands of the teachers who actually teach the material. Without this first-person perspective, many of the critical aspects of the various textbooks cannot be fully understood, and thus more problems are created when there is a rift between teacher and textbook. However, when this division is reconciled, the power behind the teaching increases dramatically, and real strides towards progress can occur.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Wayne,
ReplyDeleteI love your idea of teachers being able to choose their books and material so that they may better teach the course. I agree and believe that if this country is so dedicated to education then we should give its leaders, educators, and teachers more control. Still, have books monitored or selected at District level, but as you stated, give them more of a choice.
And you're right, many books are outdated and include information that it is irrelevant. You should address your ideas to your mentor, perhaps the two of you can collaborate and make a change!
Best of luck :)
Sunday
Hi Wayne,
ReplyDeleteI agree with your opinion that teachers need to have more say in which textbooks they are teaching from. It seems like it would be extremely difficult to teach from a book that you don’t think is relevant or written correctly. I’m sure the problem is made even more difficult with such a lack of money available for textbooks. Your idea about the teachers coming together and picking a book sounds like a good option, but I don’t know if they would all be able to agree on one book. If two people feel very strongly about two different books, how will they come to a decision? It might be helpful to elect someone to make a final decision in the case of deadlock. Having some sort of committee might be another option. Unfortunately, teachers are required to sacrifice a little because of the budget cuts. Hopefully, they will realize this and be willing to work together to find the best textbook for the class.
--Jessica Clemmons
Hey Wayne,
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I remember when I was in high school were often stuck with older textbooks that needed to be updated. Also, it did seem as if some of the teachers were not able to teach from those books as well as they might have from other books. This is sad because I was in an area that did have a lot of money for education, so to think of schools that do not have as much money is not a good thought.
I think your idea about having teachers figure out which book would best suit the needs of their students and having a defense is a great idea. It might also help if the teachers who taught the same subject area had more regular meetings to discuss exactly what it is about the book that is not working, rather than just waiting for the new year to debate it. I guess this goes along with Jessica's idea of forming a committee. That way at least there would be good reasons for why certain books were chosen.
Wouldn't it be nice if one day we didn't have to worry about this- if one day teachers had unlimited supplies? I wish...
~Justine
Hi Wayne,
ReplyDeleteYou have a very collegiate style of writing; I enjoyed reading your entry!
You brought forth a very great point in that teachers should be given the option to select their own course materials if they are the ones that will be instructing based off of that same material. I'm not sure if the difference is because of elementary vs highschool academic levels, but my intern site selects the books for the teachers not only based off of financial issues but NCLB issues as well. The district (I pressume) selects the texts that would increase the AIMS (for example) results the most. Every teacher in the respective grades has to have standardized subject matter and textbook references so that they all approach the exams in the same standardized fashion- even if money allowed- I don't think they would give them the option.
I like that you would recommend they each get to investigate their own selection depending on how they wanted to run their classroom, but how would the school monitor each teachers progress consistently? If they keep the same tests, just change the study material, would the teachers whose students didnt meet standards be forced to use the performing classes material? Would they sell the tetxbooks that they purchased for the non-performing class?
It is definitely something for the school boards to consider! Great idea.
Nikki Smith